data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/160ac/160aca4d86d99e6b69fe7d5f9fa7241b008f9522" alt=""
Even The President Thinks Law School Is A Bad Idea
Unless you're a fan of being unemployed and having lots of loan debt, don't go to law school.
Unless you're a fan of being unemployed and having lots of loan debt, don't go to law school.
* Our thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Oklahoma. [CNN] * The IRS and the Treasury Department better watch out, because it seems that the “next logical step” for the tea party victims of heightened scrutiny leads right up the courthouse stairs. [ABC News] * #Whatshouldwecallme after advising on the $1.1 billion Yahoo/Tumblr deal? Kind of a big deal. The Biglaw firms doing the underlying legal work are Simpson Thatcher and Gunderson Dettmer. [Am Law Daily] * The Mirena MDL judge thinks female attorneys should be on the all-male executive committee. If this is “strategic gender placement,” the strategy is to look bad publicly. [Thomson Reuters News & Insight] * The Travers Smith trainee who was fired for getting pregnant is due in court this June to find out what type of compensation she’ll receive for being discriminated against by the firm. You go girl! [Daily Mail] * Wherein the parents of a 0L who’s got doubts about her employment prospects are counseled that she can “work not just in law.” ::facepalm:: [Law Admissions Lowdown / U.S. News & World Report] * There’s trouble in paradise: lawyers in the Jodi Arias case unsuccessfully attempted to get a mistrial and withdraw from representation — for the second time — during its punishment phase. [Fox News]
How to make the right decision, and why there might be another way to shape a fulfilling legal career on your own terms.
A Tumblr called Lawyer Men Explain Things To Me should eventually be a lot of fun...
Today’s your lucky today, because this week, we spoke to the anonymous internet diva behind the latest law school craze, #wheninlawschool….
Pinterest is still in its infancy, but it's already facing its first backlash/potential legal controversy, a problem kicked off a few weeks ago by a lawyer-slash-photographer who thought she noticed something fishy about the startup's terms of service policy. Namely, how does a company built on the premise of users sharing art they don't own protect itself? Pass the buck on, of course…